From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/55251 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Spam.el tutorial Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:12:47 +0000 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <87brq8h3g0.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> References: <87pteok281.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> <4nn09sbhvy.fsf@collins.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1071609209 14615 80.91.224.253 (16 Dec 2003 21:13:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3791@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Dec 16 22:13:25 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AWMVQ-0004ee-00 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:13:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AWMVD-0000TL-00; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:13:11 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AWMV6-0000TF-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:13:04 -0600 Original-Received: from mail.emptydomain.de (213-203-244-156.kunde.vdserver.de [213.203.244.156]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2C33A0044 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:13:03 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by mail.emptydomain.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CA57A1B801; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <4nn09sbhvy.fsf@collins.bwh.harvard.edu> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:57:21 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55251 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55251 Ted Zlatanov writes: > Have you looked at my recent post on the spam-autodetect and > spam-autodetect-methods group/topic parameters? It tries to address > NNTP spam and generally backends where there is no incoming split. No, I only discovered that later. >From a short look at your post it seems that you give spam-autodetect a list of things to try, then it will do so. My problem, then, is that I don't know what to put into that list. I learned from Reiner's post that there is GMANE spam reporting built into spam.el. So that's clearly a candidate. But what about the other NNTP groups? Or is spam-autodetect smarter than I think and it doesn't need a list of things to try? Kai