From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54661 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Russ Allbery Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam/ham exit processors Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 19:03:32 -0800 Organization: The Eyrie Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <87brrs25tn.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> References: <76ekwpy35x.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> <4nllqx47mx.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <87ptg9ryb2.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> <87vfq15h3o.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4nllqx16ul.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <877k2h5ds4.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4nptg8sw8u.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1067915036 3258 80.91.224.253 (4 Nov 2003 03:03:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 03:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3202@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Nov 04 04:03:54 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AGrU2-0007hB-00 for ; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 04:03:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AGrTr-0007A4-00; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 21:03:43 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AGrTk-00079c-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 21:03:36 -0600 Original-Received: from smtp5.Stanford.EDU (smtp5.Stanford.EDU [171.67.16.30]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2F93A004F for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 21:03:35 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147]) by smtp5.Stanford.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id hA433WtN024540 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 19:03:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: (qmail 11739 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Nov 2003 03:03:32 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <4nptg8sw8u.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Mon, 03 Nov 2003 21:28:17 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54661 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54661 Ted Zlatanov writes: > I think you want an intermediate "spam" group with its > process-destination set to "train", and then run spam-processors on > "train" only. So all spam will flow to "spam" and then you can pop ham > back out of "spam" before it all gets moved into "train." > I like the "train" approach also because Bogofilter can be easily run > on all those messages from the command line. Oh, that's a really good idea. I hadn't thought of that at all. Thank you! -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)