From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36256 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Roland Mas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Would like to display part of body in subject in summary buffer Date: 17 May 2001 15:19:19 +0200 Organization: =?iso-8859-1?q?=C9cho?= interactive Message-ID: <87bsosazag.fsf@cachemir.echo-net.net> References: <01May17.112653cst.119271@ns.alcatel.com.tw> <01May17.204322cst.119052@ns.alcatel.com.tw> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171873 7619 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:44:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 26170 invoked by alias); 17 May 2001 13:19:27 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 26165 invoked from network); 17 May 2001 13:19:27 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (195.204.10.139) by gnus.org with SMTP; 17 May 2001 13:19:27 -0000 Original-Received: (from news@localhost) by quimby.gnus.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA30181 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 17 May 2001 15:19:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: blackhole.x-echo.com Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 990105558 17345 195.101.94.7 (17 May 2001 13:19:18 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 May 2001 13:19:18 GMT Mail-Copies-To: never X-Face: ,MPrV]g0IX5D7rgJol{*%.pQltD?!TFg(`c8(2pkt-F0SLh(g3mIFYU1GYf]C/GuUTbr;cZ5y;3ALK%.OL8A.^.PW14e/,X-B?Nv}2a9\u-j0sSa User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 21 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36256 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36256 Georges KO (2001-05-17 21:03:10 +0800) : > Q: Is there a Procmail for Windows NT? > > A: No, and it's somewhat unlikely that anybody would undertake a > port. Read Bart Schaefer's excellent summary of the problems. Excerpt: > "I've seriously looked at porting it to NT, yes. The problems are > pretty severe." > > Any alternative, someone ? Maybe get the mail to be processed by a procmail located on some other system (like, on a Unix or Unix-like system ;-) and only then fetched onto your NT box? Roland. -- Roland Mas Oshitemo damedara, hiite mina. -- Proverbe japonais