From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36099 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Mail-Followup-To not only for wide replies considered harmful Date: 03 May 2001 18:29:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87bspaxup8.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <87lmoexvfv.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <87wv7ya02u.fsf@wesley.springies.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171741 6761 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:42:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 25795 invoked by alias); 3 May 2001 16:16:23 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 25790 invoked from network); 3 May 2001 16:16:21 -0000 Original-Received: from mail.s.netic.de (HELO mail.netic.de) (212.9.160.11) by gnus.org with SMTP; 3 May 2001 16:16:21 -0000 Original-Received: by mail.netic.de (Smail3.2.0.111/mail.s.netic.de) via LF.net GmbH Internet Services via remoteip 212.9.163.23 via remotehost mail.enyo.de with esmtp for mail.gnus.org id m14vLm9-001WzFC; Thu, 3 May 2001 18:16:21 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de ident=exim) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 14vLl8-0005Eo-00 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 03 May 2001 18:15:18 +0200 Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.12 #1) id 14vLyV-0000Tf-00 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 03 May 2001 18:29:07 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <87wv7ya02u.fsf@wesley.springies.com> (Alan Shutko's message of "Thu, 03 May 2001 12:07:37 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 21 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36099 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36099 Alan Shutko writes: > Florian Weimer writes: > > > Is anyone opposing the following patch? > > > > 2001-05-03 Florian Weimer > > > > * message.el (message-dont-reply-to-names): Fix documentation. > > (message-get-reply-headers): Use Mail-Followup-To only for wide > > replies. > > Would that mean that I'd have to stop using F in mailing lists and > switch to S W all the time? Currently, Mail-Followup-To works with > followups.... Followups are wide replies, at least in some sense (news vs. mail). Does this answer your question? (However, I've noticed that the Mail-Followup-To: header is rapidly becoming less and less useful.)