From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/26102 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Numbering invisible parts Date: 01 Nov 1999 03:57:47 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87bt9ezzo4.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> References: <87aeoz14yq.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> <87k8o3yrn9.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> <2n1zabapsf.fsf@tiger.jia.vnet> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163373 17600 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:22:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA20524 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 21:58:21 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAB32198; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 20:58:19 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 31 Oct 1999 20:58:38 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA13514 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 20:58:28 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from pc-hrvoje.srce.hr (mail@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr [161.53.2.132]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA20511 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 21:57:55 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from hniksic by pc-hrvoje.srce.hr with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian)) id 11i7fK-0006np-00 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 1999 03:57:50 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > >>>>> "HN" == Hrvoje Niksic writes: > > [...] > > HN> Another reason why not numbering hidden buttons would be useful: > HN> In the usual case, there is only one attachment in a message; with > HN> my proposed change, you could simply press `b' to activate it. As > HN> things are now, you have to press `2 b', or `3 b', or... > > Right. Why not make life easier? Thanks; this is cool, although it breaks the usual "no-argument-means-1" assumption with cooked numerical prefixes. However, it only partially fixes my problem, because I would like `1 b' (or just b) to work on the first button I see, `2 b' on the second, etc. Maybe numbering invisible parts should be an option? I never want to number invisible parts, while Kai always wants to number them. Sounds like we need an option to settle our differences. :-)