From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/85589 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [gmane.emacs.gnus.user] Re: One folder in local imap not seen Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:37:05 +0800 Message-ID: <87d260e1da.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87mwb9wb4o.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87vbpwvjj0.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87a978vfdl.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87egqg7k37.fsf@building.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422369126 12407 80.91.229.3 (27 Jan 2015 14:32:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:32:06 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M33829@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Jan 27 15:32:06 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YG7BM-00082r-4O for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:31:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1YG7AY-0004FZ-Mn; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:31:06 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1YG7AX-0004FN-EH for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:31:05 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YG7AT-0005L4-2N for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:31:04 -0600 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YG7AQ-0000gr-UM for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:30:58 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YG7AH-00071P-T1 for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:30:51 +0100 Original-Received: from 123.123.18.151 ([123.123.18.151]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:30:49 +0100 Original-Received: from eric by 123.123.18.151 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:30:49 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 123.123.18.151 User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:TgDS7fABND5IXUG9RafQP22+y0U= X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.4.0 2014-02-07) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-44--2635h-0s--0d--changelog, 0.000-30--1797h-0s--0d--patch, 0.000-5--254h-0s--0d--writes, 0.000-4--236h-0s--0d--correctly, 0.000-4--223h-0s--0d--H*M:fsf Spam tokens: 0.993-1654--63h-849s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.992-1718--80h-889s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-external:quimby.gnus.org, 0.992-1718--80h-889s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.991-1711--87h-889s--0d--H*RT:quimby.gnus.org, 0.991-1711--87h-889s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-internal:80.91.231.51 Autolearn status: no autolearn_force=no -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.0 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 No description available. List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:85589 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> Just to confirm this, would you mind eval'ling this version of >> nnimap-get-groups, and seeing if it helps? It's an ugly hack from ages >> ago, that I used when I was having this problem, but then I stopped >> using it, I don't remember why. It's possible I used it for a while, the >> groups were entered correctly into my newsrc, and then when I stopped >> using it it didn't break anything, so I let it go. > > Could you submit a patch with this fix? :-) Can do! Will this require any NEWS or CHANGELOG entries?