From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/85255 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: lee Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: dealing with separate accounts separately in gnus Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 01:06:43 +0100 Organization: my virtual residence Message-ID: <87d28vvrzg.fsf@yun.yagibdah.de> References: <8738c3c4fn.fsf@yun.yagibdah.de> <87fvg2yhwl.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87bnqp7sef.fsf@yun.yagibdah.de> <87k35d3i4s.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415664582 8205 80.91.229.3 (11 Nov 2014 00:09:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:09:42 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M33499@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Nov 11 01:09:35 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xnz1Y-0008OS-Ff for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 01:09:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Xnz1I-0003JZ-5g; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:09:16 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1XncVV-0005Kx-Ed for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 18:06:57 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XncVT-00077U-7F for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 18:06:56 -0600 Original-Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.217]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XncVR-0000gq-1B for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 01:06:53 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1415578012; l=1522; s=domk; d=yagibdah.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Date: In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From; bh=YKBsw5wZgbbtm4LH9sVVu00GRvc=; b=FNp7MvT9aQnB5+4nMyFdGX9ShV1h8SOo1JdCAVRaprVjGBb1HT5GzdBKx0W+r2rlNZT jltK9ewZIfVYn62JXo7OlR1/cHzPdWT0bYoPQ48zAWqq4/SeKJuceJqF88BhmRbNT+wCw 3MMhzbf0DASg0qXsf9UnlAJqmkB4F1LbVcM= X-RZG-AUTH: :O2kGeEG7b/pS1FS4THaxjVF9w0vVgfQ9xHcw0u9bPwwMFwe5A1Mf1jo8+wbUeX1fjiA= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Original-Received: from jarl.yagibdah.de ([185.55.75.245]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 35.10 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id h05436qAA06qsbX (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 01:06:52 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from yun.yagibdah.de ([192.168.3.20]) by jarl.yagibdah.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XncVQ-0001kJ-7j for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 01:06:52 +0100 Original-Received: from lee by yun.yagibdah.de with local (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XncVQ-0002ra-3c for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 01:06:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87k35d3i4s.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> ("Adam \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Sj\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?\=C3\=B8gren\=22's\?\= message of "Mon, 08 Sep 2014 23:41:07 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:85255 Archived-At: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sj=C3=B8gren) writes: > lee writes: > >> The server I already have is the mail-source: > >> (setq mail-sources >> '((imap :server "jarl.yagibdah.de" :stream ssl))) >> > > This is the "using IMAP as glorified POP"-way of using IMAP, which isn't > the usual mode. Well, it has its advantages. And I had all the mail locally before I set up the IMAP server and wasn't keen on moving it all over. It would also require to have sufficient disc space on the IMAP server which kinda is a waste. > (Although a perfectly fine thing to do, when you want your emails > locally.) > > [...] > >> The second account must not interfere in any way with this. > > Just add nnimap servers to gnus-secondary-methods for the other > accounts, and you should be golden. > > The mail from these accounts will stay on the IMAP-server, when you > configure Gnus like this. For those other accounts, that's desirable. > [...] > >> 'gnus-secondary-select-methods? IIRC that would interfere badly with >> what I have now. > > How? Like the mail splitting becoming uncertain about where to put the messages and being uncertain about where to put them when I move messages from one folder to another manually. I might be better off setting up gnus for a different user. That would really keep it separately :) --=20 Again we must be afraid of speaking of daemons for fear that daemons might swallow us. Finally, this fear has become reasonable.