From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/73597 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Outstanding stuff? Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:11:45 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: <87d3qy58xq.fsf@localhost6.localdomain6> References: <87lj5mw5y9.fsf@dod.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288037717 624 80.91.229.12 (25 Oct 2010 20:15:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:15:17 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M21966@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Oct 25 22:15:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PATRp-0001QS-6P for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:15:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PATRm-00008t-LX; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:15:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PATRl-00008Y-0W for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:15:09 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PATRj-00037b-69 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:15:08 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PATRi-0007zf-00 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:15:06 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PATRf-0001MO-Ln for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:15:03 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.208.204.33.getinternet.no ([84.208.204.33]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:15:03 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by cm-84.208.204.33.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:15:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.208.204.33.getinternet.no Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:z2Mc4mDMEOOZyRDzffhHLQnsOW8= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:73597 Archived-At: >>>>> Robert Pluim : > I don't think nnimap -> nnml would qualify for the 'on the same IMAP > server' statement Lars made there. Me neither (as in "don't think"). But I would like to hear it from the horse's mouth, so to speak. Specifically: will this harm the cross-backend interoperability, or is this something that won't affect that, but will same-server nnimap operations be faster? (which I'm all for, btw. I'm a long time nnimap user. But I've also found cross-backend moves and copies useful over the years...)