From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/72262 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Florian Ragwitz Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce gnus-completing-read Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:42:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87d3rv4fvz.fsf@tardis.home.perldition.org> References: <1285688153-19680-1-git-send-email-julien@danjou.info> <87wrq5ammm.fsf@tardis.home.perldition.org> <87eicdacn6.fsf@tardis.home.perldition.org> <87hbh9tx2x.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87y6aj7mp2.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <87y6aj4jjk.fsf@tardis.home.perldition.org> <87hbh74gb5.fsf@tardis.home.perldition.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285846999 5340 80.91.229.12 (30 Sep 2010 11:43:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:43:19 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M20635@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Sep 30 13:43:18 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1HXh-0001E2-JT for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:43:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P1HXW-0001pM-UP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:43:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P1HXV-0001p4-1K for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:43:05 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P1HXQ-0006iQ-Gq for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:43:04 -0500 Original-Received: from kief.perldition.org ([78.47.20.161]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P1HXP-0005Dr-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:42:59 +0200 Original-Received: from p4fd7608c.dip.t-dialin.net ([79.215.96.140] helo=tardis.home.perldition.org) by kief.perldition.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1HXO-0007mL-Iw for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:42:59 +0200 Original-Received: from rafl by tardis.home.perldition.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P1HWe-0003LE-1X for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:42:12 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:36:56 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Spam_score: -3.8 X-Spam_score_int: -37 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "kief.perldition.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Florian Ragwitz writes: > >>> Julien, could you roll back all the code from Florian? >> >> Here's a patch to do just that: > > Hm... that's less than ten lines in total, so I think that should be > OK. We only have to mark the change as (tiny change) in the > ChangeLog. [...] Content analysis details: (-3.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.8 ALL_TRUSTE X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:72262 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Florian Ragwitz writes: > >>> Julien, could you roll back all the code from Florian? >> >> Here's a patch to do just that: > > Hm... that's less than ten lines in total, so I think that should be > OK. We only have to mark the change as (tiny change) in the > ChangeLog. Actually, there's also the change this thread was about. I didn't realise it was merged already and forgot to include it in the revert. Sorry about that. Unfortunately, that change isn't as easy to revert as the other ones, due to the changes that are already based upon it, so it requires some manual merging. If necessary, I can submit a patch doing that tomorrow. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkykd5EACgkQdC8qQo5jWl6VIgCghlY22gcQEZQS6Ro5fSR8AhBW IF0An02WJn41EFbhFnlyazsdozOdo1F/ =lpJT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--