Re: NotDashEscaped, what?

[michael@cadilhac.name (Michaël Cadilhac)]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1763 bytes --]

Daiki Ueno <ueno@unixuser.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
>>>>>> In <87ps19avog.fsf@cadilhac.name> 
>>>>>>	michael@cadilhac.name (Michaël Cadilhac) wrote:
>> > No, but suppose the following case: the original text contains a line
>> > led by "- " (0x2D 0x20) as it is, and NotDashEscaped is specified by
>> > the sender.   You will see the "- " prefix removed by Gnus.
>
> I believe it is fixed now.  This is a test mail.  If you see no
> NotDashEscaped and a "- " (0x2D 0x20) prefix on the next line, the test
> is successful ;-)
> - test

The test seems fully successful! However your mail pointed out another
bug ; this is a mail sent in pgpmime, as displayed in Gnus:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[PGP Signed Part:Good signature from 50984398E7C50375 [...]]]
[1. text/plain]
"Daiki Ueno" <ueno@unixuser.org> writes:

> Hi,

------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a mail sent with an inline PGP signature:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[PGP Signed Part:Signature made by expired key A5B6B2D4B15813FE [...]]]
[1. text/plain]

Hi,
------------------------------------------------------------------------

So, the problem isn't that your key seems expired ;-) but that there is
a newline before your text, which AFAIC test, wasn't something you did
on purpose.

So long!

-- 
 |   Michaël `Micha' Cadilhac       |  <ESC>ape this <COLON> thing,          |
 |   http://michael.cadilhac.name   |           <Q>uit and                   |
 |   JID/MSN:                       |    do <NOT> <RET>urn.                  |
 `----  michael.cadilhac@gmail.com  |          -- VI                    -  --'

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]