From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54081 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: How to load spam.el just for gmane reporting? Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 00:39:11 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <87d6dl6els.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no> References: <87d6do7kd4.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1064702371 11618 80.91.224.253 (27 Sep 2003 22:39:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 22:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M2622@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Sep 28 00:39:29 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A3Nir-0004Lx-00 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 00:39:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1A3Nik-0007nn-00; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 17:39:22 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1A3Nig-0007ni-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 17:39:18 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0C23A004B for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 17:39:14 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A3Nib-0005CA-00 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 00:39:13 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A3Nia-0005C2-00 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 00:39:12 +0200 Original-Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A3Nia-00030v-00 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 00:39:12 +0200 Original-Lines: 47 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:L3QU4bCsb008In1IE+Ydyxqa+fM= Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54081 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54081 >>>>> Ted Stern : [snip!] > ;; Set up spam reporting > (require 'spam) > (require 'spam-report) So spam-use-* is not neccessary? Perhaps the manual should be changed to reflect this? > I put all my Gmane groups in a single Topic. Then I customize group > parameters for the Topic ("G p" on the "Gmane" topic line in the *Group* > buffer): > ((spam-process > (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-report-gmane))) Hm... I can't (actually "won't") do it that way. But thanx for the tip! Putting spam-process into all gmane groups' group parameters, is too much work, and is something I'd have to remember when creating new groups. So I guess I'll have to figure out how to set up the gnus-spam-process-destinations variable. I tried the following, (setq gnus-spam-process-newsgroups (list (list "^nntp+news.gmane.org" 'gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-report-gmane) )) and then entered a gmane group, marked the spam articles with M-d, and exited the group. The minibuffer messages were Marking spam as expired without moving it Exiting summary buffer and applying spam rules How do I know if the setting of gnus-spam-process-newsgroups "took"? I don't think it did, because the exit was too fast. It wasn't held up by doing 6 HTTP requests to gmane. Thanx! - Steinar