From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/39664 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Davide G. M. Salvetti" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: new Mail-Followup-To patch...please take a look... Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 00:40:15 +0200 Organization: Quis ut Deus? Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87d73evv3k.fsf@hal.Olympus.INVALID> References: <87wv1m9y6j.fsf@mclinux.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035175339 29175 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:42:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:42:19 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 13000 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2001 23:00:37 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2001 23:00:37 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 15wAWb-0002tH-00; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 17:59:57 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 23 Oct 2001 17:59:34 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA09447 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 17:59:19 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 12950 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2001 22:59:36 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 12945 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2001 22:59:36 -0000 Original-Received: from smtp2.libero.it (193.70.192.52) by gnus.org with SMTP; 23 Oct 2001 22:59:36 -0000 Original-Received: from Lepus.Olympus.INVALID (151.14.161.236) by smtp2.libero.it (6.0.032) id 3BD43C150007B3E3 for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 00:59:08 +0200 Original-Received: from hal.Olympus.INVALID (HAL.Olympus.INVALID [192.168.247.1]) by Lepus.Olympus.INVALID (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3406416869 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 00:34:20 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from salve by hal.Olympus.INVALID with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15wADX-0002s2-00 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 00:40:15 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: nobody Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: DGMS X-GPG-Fingerprint: D3B2 A3F5 E9EB BDE6 A245 AA4A 212B 306C 9396 865D X-Face: &6g,d%3hP0[qul^Z;FuwvIxNxPy2:}9K`7D?&sDX@xTwx7Z\S\AK\jI)J$yL:J>70*[c!k* [qo4Zx')Q_zPtl]25VG[X#6xMVp_1K!t- U{izN"hVM!$1`P\v~sRS:)^t_{py+"YcZ|2^z=AUz4"ZJNrtP@;'8dyarKA7)OPjihAGsMb In-Reply-To: (prj@po.cwru.edu's message of "Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:32:06 -0400") Original-Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39664 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39664 >>>>> "PJ" == Paul Jarc writes: PJ> '(lambda ...) does not get byte-compiled. (function (lambda ...)) PJ> does, and otherwise means the same thing. Ok for '(lambda). But what's the point in writing #'(lambda ...) if (lambda ...) already evaluates to it (being lambda a macro)? Is that some kind of stylistic convention, or there is really something more? -- Salve, | Davide | GNU PG (GPG) Key ID: 939686D5