From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38791 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nuutti Kotivuori Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: IMAP vs nnml ? (was: Palm and Gnus) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:13:00 +0300 Message-ID: <87d74rzbo3.fsf@smarttrust.com> References: <87d74u4r9g.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> <87zo7wsqm8.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174597 24329 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:29:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:29:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 12408 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2001 08:57:17 -0000 Original-Received: from smtp.dave.sonera.fi (131.177.130.21) by gnus.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2001 08:57:17 -0000 Original-Received: from kotivnu1-nb.etela.sonera.fi ([131.177.205.219]:32769 "EHLO oro") by inside.dave.sonera.fi with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 11:57:02 +0300 Original-Received: from naked by oro with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15iYv6-0000ZR-00; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:13:00 +0300 Original-To: Fabien Penso In-Reply-To: (Fabien Penso's message of "Sat, 15 Sep 2001 14:21:36 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) Original-Lines: 9 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38791 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38791 Fabien Penso wrote: > By the way. Would I get better performance if I was using a local > IMAP server on my laptop rather than nnml groups ? I have about > 16.000 mails in my main mbox, I just wonder how to improve perf... If you run an IMAP server that has a database backend, that might help things. -- Naked