From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38134 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matt Christian Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Rendering on Bm Date: 20 Aug 2001 18:26:35 -0500 Message-ID: <87d75qxqhg.fsf@powerhouse.boogie.cx> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035173762 19232 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:16:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:16:02 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 24143 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2001 23:27:17 -0000 Original-Received: from msp-65-25-208-131.mn.rr.com (HELO powerhouse.boogie.cx) (65.25.208.131) by gnus.org with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 23:27:17 -0000 Original-Received: by powerhouse.boogie.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 563AA24022; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 18:26:35 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: IR8W]Y/U1es]@Yc@^8U}B92@nH]$2xFU)bqCkU}GRH.wl{nZQndC#s^-Zu'p^&zO_8E6cp< zG-(Zj,)eO4!*jU6>ijpvLu03,Jl!(/T,3A>.9-OAsP&NRS;DW^sNZ&vKgE\j!sux'BDwbX26]D+hF x"7n.37 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef) Original-Lines: 33 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38134 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38134 Hi, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Karl Kleinpaste writes: > > > Considering that the entire `B' keymap consists of actions involving > > shuffling things around in the backend (i.e. the filesystem) rather > > than the frontend (i.e. my eyeballs)... [...] I'm moving > > the articles Elsewhere -- why should I care about _anything_ having to do > > with rendering, least of all the complicated nightmare of invoking PGP? > > Well, you've convinced me. Should I make all the > moving/copying/re-spooling functions completely non-selecting? I'm not Karl (or Lars ;) but I'll put my $.02 US in now... I run into this very same problem when dealing with spam in Gnus. Gnus attempts to render HTML-based email before completely throwing away the result and moving the article. I know about the discouraged-alteratives variables but what spam is actually RFC compliant? I'd rather have commands like 'B m' just move the dang article without even invoking any display/rendering routines. Short answer: yes, could someone please make these functions non-selecting? - Matt -- Matt Christian - mattc@visi.com http://www.visi.com/~mattc/ ftp://ftp.visi.com/users/mattc/ Learn to love and love to learn.