From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/87391 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: registry and the gnus-summary-line-format Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 08:59:58 -0800 Message-ID: <87efyqduup.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87wpcl3lee.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87fuj96589.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87y3wzhhwi.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <878toztso2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87wpcjflnr.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87o9xvs8ce.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87fuj7z4qb.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87poibf4gn.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <8760k24lwp.fsf@mat.ucm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1487782872 27530 195.159.176.226 (22 Feb 2017 17:01:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:01:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/26.0 (gnu/linux) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m35612@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Feb 22 18:01:08 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from mxfilter-048035.atla03.us.yomura.com ([107.189.48.35]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cgaHq-0006UX-JR for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:01:06 +0100 X-Yomura-MXScrub: 1.0 Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu (unknown [129.7.128.208]) by mxfilter-048035.atla03.us.yomura.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 827a089d-f920-11e6-b156-b499baabecb2; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cgaH8-0000ER-C6; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:00:22 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cgaH5-0000Dk-Jl for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:00:19 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cgaH3-0001tX-VU for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:00:19 -0600 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (helo=blaine.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cgaH2-0005T1-JD for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:00:16 +0100 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cgaGu-0001YJ-Tb for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:00:08 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 43 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:QDJYOT+0KlVo2mHKMNmQmSB0oxw= List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:87391 Archived-At: Uwe Brauer writes: > > Uwe Brauer writes: > > > Good! There's no longer a separate git repo for Gnus -- it is developed > > within the Emacs repository. Unfortunately this means that you won't get > > the fix until it's committed to Emacs and then comes back down whatever > > pipeline you use to install Emacs. > > > It also means I'm a wee bit more hesitant about committing directly -- I > > have access, but would prefer to open a bug report and get more eyes. > > I'll do that in a bit. > > BTW, would it be difficult to implement colors for different registries, > like red for important etc, just asking... You mean different colors for different marks? I don't suppose that would be too hard. We could save a different face name in each element of gnus-registry-marks. > > I did get your other email, but I suppose this is a fine place to work > > it out. > > > If you've loaded gnorb-gnus I don't see how > > `gnus-user-format-function-g' could be undefined. That file contains, at > > top-level, this form: > > > > (fset (intern (concat "gnus-user-format-function-" > > gnorb-gnus-summary-mark-format-letter)) > > (lambda (header) > > (gnorb-gnus-insert-format-letter-maybe header))) > > > Which should do the trick. > > > Right, my gnorb init file was not complete. After the correction the > registry error is gone, I still run into difficulties but I report on > this later. Good -- I'll take a look at that other message in a bit. Eric