From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/81035 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: bug#10238: R in gnus-summary does not pop a frame like F does Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:45:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87ehugajy7.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87pqe8kbg1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83pqe823oj.fsf@gnu.org> <87vco0ivb1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wr8fhloi.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: bugs@gnus.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327963560 8945 80.91.229.3 (30 Jan 2012 22:46:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10238@debbugs.gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, ding@gnus.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 30 23:45:57 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrzz3-0000oF-3H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:45:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60947 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrzz2-0003Xa-CB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:45:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38151) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrzyy-0003XB-Q4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:45:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrzyx-00055O-5f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:45:52 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42148) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrzyx-00055E-43 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:45:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrzz8-0007XC-DU; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:46:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10238 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 10238@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Andreas Schwab , bugs@gnus.org, ding@gnus.org Original-Received: via spool by 10238-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10238.132796354428927 (code B ref 10238); Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10238) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2012 22:45:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45770 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrzyp-0007WT-RB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:45:44 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:49606) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrzyn-0007WL-IF for 10238@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:45:42 -0500 Original-Received: from 93-41-188-50.ip82.fastwebnet.it ([93.41.188.50] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrzyV-0002Ei-5h; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:45:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87wr8fhloi.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:00:13 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1RrzyV-0002Ei-5h MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1328568323.7716@07071/+RkDg46pxe0WW+Uw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56264 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:81035 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > I think we should try to keep it under 80, and if it has to go over, the > essential information should be before the 80th char. But forcing it to > 80 will force us to write convoluted summaries that misrepresent the > commit for the sake of saving a few characters. I think it's fine for the summary line to not describe the entire patch. If it says something like "rfc2047 parameter fixups", and then the rest of the commit message explains in excruciating details what's been done and why, then that's to be preferred. Reading the summary lines is then fast and you'll quickly determine which patches you're interested in looking further at, and which ones you don't care about. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome