From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/79455 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: pmlists@free.fr (Peter =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=BCnster?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: setting face in gnus-user-format-function-x (solved) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:15:04 +0200 Organization: Micropit Message-ID: <87ei1u35k7.fsf_-_@micropit.couberia.bzh> References: <87sjs5thro.fsf@micropit.couberia.bzh> <87hb8b8i2u.fsf@micropit.couberia.bzh> <87hb7hdjdj.fsf@micropit.couberia.bzh> <871uyfzbk8.fsf@micropit.couberia.bzh> <87sjqrnbnc.fsf@micropit.couberia.bzh> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310549242 1277 80.91.229.12 (13 Jul 2011 09:27:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:27:22 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M27751@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Jul 13 11:27:19 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qgviw-0000NQ-Vz for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:27:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Qgvhy-0006No-7I; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 04:26:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QgvXQ-0006LA-4h for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 04:15:24 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QgvXO-00045R-O9 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 04:15:23 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QgvXL-0006dR-Th for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:15:19 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgvXL-0003P9-QP for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:15:19 +0200 Original-Received: from arennes-651-1-106-120.w2-2.abo.wanadoo.fr ([2.2.1.120]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:15:19 +0200 Original-Received: from pmlists by arennes-651-1-106-120.w2-2.abo.wanadoo.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:15:19 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 42 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: arennes-651-1-106-120.w2-2.abo.wanadoo.fr User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:VI3XfY+7hxvDZT2N1N112dJRX/U= X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:79455 Archived-At: On Fri, Jul 01 2011, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Uhm... try edebugging through `gnus-summary-update-article-line' and > see what happens. :-) Ok, it seems, that `gnus-summary-update-article-line' should only be called, when the summary buffer has already been prepared. So I have to avoid calling `my-summary-update' when creating a new summary buffer. This works for me now: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (defun my-summary-prepared () (setq gnus-summary-update-hook '(my-summary-update))) (defun my-summary-exit () (setq gnus-summary-update-hook nil)) (defun my-summary-update () (my-summary-exit) (gnus-summary-update-article-line (gnus-summary-article-number) (gnus-summary-article-header (gnus-summary-article-number))) (my-summary-prepared)) (defun gnus-user-format-function-x (header) (propertize (format "%c" gnus-tmp-unread) 'face (if (equal gnus-tmp-unread gnus-ancient-mark) gnus-face-2 gnus-face-3) 'gnus-face t)) (setq gnus-summary-prepared-hook '(my-summary-prepared)) (setq gnus-summary-exit-hook '(my-summary-exit)) (setq gnus-summary-line-format "%ux%R%3P %-10&user-date; %-17,17f(%4k)%* %B%s\n") --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- What do you think? Any suggestions for doing this better? Cheers, -- Peter