From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/79134 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Bug with referring articles Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:51:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87ei2t4ksj.fsf@member.fsf.org> References: <87fwnbr15c.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87boxzhrs8.fsf@member.fsf.org> <87oc1y1d6i.fsf@member.fsf.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308253983 15846 80.91.229.12 (16 Jun 2011 19:53:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , ding@gnus.org To: Dave Abrahams Original-X-From: ding-owner+M27433@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Jun 16 21:52:59 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXIca-0006tD-S1 for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:52:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QXIbN-000174-NM; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:51:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QXIbM-00016v-4P for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:51:40 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QXIbB-0008Vr-R9 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:51:39 -0500 Original-Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QXIbA-0001nq-13 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:51:28 +0200 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB17203AF; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:51:26 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from frontend1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:51:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=2lABl2ENkJoDML82XanzZkuz+Xo=; b=kbEVrxDcMyClWJHZ6Y6fGXkoREZcxze7BpJxoPzmwaOEoMkCC9+Z7NLeFqb+RVoylc0RDVYuduE+pfFryg0lJe5pvXO9T5ayIWSf2S7zKa5spw5DqpfoEQbzT6um5bRVxiM4yHTIA26PE699OltK5tl8Ndyuv/yiJ15D3/pjVVM= X-Sasl-enc: NlvrDWQL6n6fC4FTPlxN1ipES5o+/I4okCQpKWEhW6WJ 1308253886 Original-Received: from thinkpad (178-27-29-99-dynip.superkabel.de [178.27.29.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DDF30402FF8; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:51:25 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Dave Abrahams's message of "Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:10:02 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:79134 Archived-At: Dave Abrahams writes: Hi! >> Firstly, the current code for referring articles is broken, because >> only the first method in `gnus-refer-article-method' is actually >> tried as I've explained in <87fwnbr15c.fsf@fastmail.fm>. So that >> has to be fixed anyway. >> >> Secondly, I think that the `current' method may perform nnir searches >> over all groups of that server if the article cannot be found in the >> current group and nnir is configured properly, as it is by default for >> IMAP. Or alternatively, there might be some new `current-nnir' method. >> >> However, I have to admit that this is only some conceptual talk. I have >> no real clue how the code is supposed to work, and this whole summary >> updating doesn't look too trivial. :-) > > Is there a place where we can put this information so that it will be > treated as a bug report, and someone who has the missing clue might > respond? I'm optimistic that Lars sends a "Done!" message the next few days (*wink*, *wink*). If not, I'll submit a report to the emacs bug tracker. (Or should one still use M-x gnus-bug? I think, some weeks ago Ted asked on emacs-devel if gnus bugs could be filed at emacs debbugs as well, and that his suggestion has been accepted...) Bye, Tassilo