From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/72846 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: splitting working now : some issues/questions Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 03:46:53 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87eibyjuyq.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <9i4ocwyc69.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <87wrpstwvz.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8uy6a67ugj.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <87sk0ek21m.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286700506 3050 80.91.229.12 (10 Oct 2010 08:48:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:48:26 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M21218@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Oct 10 10:48:25 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P4rZv-0002pu-Nr for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:48:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P4rZ4-0001O6-DL; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 03:47:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P4rZ1-0001No-9b for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 03:47:27 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P4rYz-0001q4-Ed for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 03:47:26 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P4rYy-0004tj-00 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:47:24 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P4rYy-0002TV-5A for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:47:24 +0200 Original-Received: from c-24-14-16-248.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([24.14.16.248]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:47:24 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by c-24-14-16-248.hsd1.il.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:47:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 26 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-14-16-248.hsd1.il.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:nAQPR0aAnF7PUnhGG58I37402ts= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:72846 Archived-At: On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:57:34 +0200 Richard Riley wrote: RR> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 03:09:55 +0200 Richard Riley wrote: >> RR> Could (or should) the group parameter spam destination please default to RR> the groups server? Currently if I set the spam dest as an unqualified RR> Gnus-Spam for my nnimap server then its going to nnml:Gnus-Spam. I need RR> to currently fully qualify it to e.g nnimap+riley:Gnus-Spam. >> >> I think it should behave like a regular group name, which is the >> behaviour you're noting. RR> I am wondering why this would be better since unqualified is more RR> "local" and is the way for things like spam-split and spam-inbox. If RR> working on a group that belongs to a server it seems logical that merely RR> setting a group destination without fully qualifier such as RR> "nnimap+riles" means on that current group's server on not on some other RR> such as nnml which may, or may not, be random depending on select order. For spam-split and general splitting, actually I have wanted for a long time the group name to be qualified, but currently splitting only works to the same server. To keep with the Gnus conventions, I'd prefer to keep group names qualified whenever poassible. Ted