From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/72327 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Florian Ragwitz Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce gnus-completing-read Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:41:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87eicbyvqs.fsf@tardis.home.perldition.org> References: <1285688153-19680-1-git-send-email-julien@danjou.info> <87wrq5ammm.fsf@tardis.home.perldition.org> <87eicdacn6.fsf@tardis.home.perldition.org> <87hbh9tx2x.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87y6aj7mp2.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <87y6aj4jjk.fsf@tardis.home.perldition.org> <87hbh74gb5.fsf@tardis.home.perldition.org> <87d3rv4fvz.fsf@tardis.home.perldition.org> <87sk0r2xzc.fsf@tardis.home.perldition.org> <87pqvv6utx.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878w2j6tp0.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k4m3ywm5.fsf@tardis.home.perldition.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285868560 13605 80.91.229.12 (30 Sep 2010 17:42:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:42:40 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M20700@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Sep 30 19:42:36 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1N9P-0005qI-TR for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:42:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P1N9N-0005Sy-FP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:42:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P1N9L-0005Sg-Je for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:42:31 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P1N9H-0000Lk-1D for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:42:31 -0500 Original-Received: from kief.perldition.org ([78.47.20.161]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P1N9G-00023h-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:42:26 +0200 Original-Received: from p4fd7608c.dip.t-dialin.net ([79.215.96.140] helo=tardis.home.perldition.org) by kief.perldition.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1N9F-0000Ii-B5 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:42:26 +0200 Original-Received: from rafl by tardis.home.perldition.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P1N8T-0004Bb-RP for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:41:37 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:39:28 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Spam_score: -3.9 X-Spam_score_int: -38 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "kief.perldition.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Florian Ragwitz writes: > >> (Well, actually I'd much rather have contributing be easy, fun, and >> encouraging more contributions, but short of that, the above appears >> to be the next best thing.) > > I think the thing to do is to first have a patch that removes all your > code, and then we'll take it from there. [...] Content analysis details: (-3.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------- X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:72327 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Florian Ragwitz writes: > >> (Well, actually I'd much rather have contributing be easy, fun, and >> encouraging more contributions, but short of that, the above appears >> to be the next best thing.) > > I think the thing to do is to first have a patch that removes all your > code, and then we'll take it from there. If I made such a patch, which I'll be happy to do, will you be allowed to apply it? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkyky8wACgkQdC8qQo5jWl7JpgCeKrQ38ScCt+6uMUiEIv3LXtjp P3UAnAktaQPMAbOnEyKuLwzlKjRfEMTr =BmQR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--