From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70746 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julien Danjou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: That newfangled IMAP thing... Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:24:52 +0200 Message-ID: <87eiczwbyz.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> References: <87hbi3jasy.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pqwmsusz.fsf@news.realpath.org> <8762yd6j4j.fsf@rimspace.net> <87eid0fsil.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp84y00w.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <874odv4ar3.fsf@rimspace.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284283548 2046 80.91.229.12 (12 Sep 2010 09:25:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 09:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Daniel Pittman Original-X-From: ding-owner+M19119@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Sep 12 11:25:47 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ouiok-0002vR-OJ for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:25:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ouiob-0005KA-Eb; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 04:25:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OuioZ-0005Jn-Bn for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 04:25:35 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OuioX-0001xs-JX for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 04:25:35 -0500 Original-Received: from prometheus.naquadah.org ([212.85.154.174] helo=mx1.naquadah.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OuioW-0006QJ-00 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:25:32 +0200 Original-Received: by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix, from userid 8) id 789285C10E; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:25:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on prometheus.naquadah.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Original-Received: from keller.adm.naquadah.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:2e39:e900:222:faff:fe9d:ce44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A66F5C0D4; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:25:00 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from jd by keller.adm.naquadah.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ouinu-0003tk-TT; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:24:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <874odv4ar3.fsf@rimspace.net> (Daniel Pittman's message of "Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:38:40 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70746 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 12 2010, Daniel Pittman wrote: > That would be the official upstream documentation about the QRESYNC varia= nt of > the "flag sync" process, and includes how to handle less capable servers. > Given that "less capable" means "most" =E2=80=94 since only Zimbra has QR= ESYNC that > I deal with regularly... Dovecot seems to have it too, FWIW. :) =2D-=20 Julien Danjou // =E1=90=B0 http://julien.danjou.info --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkyMnGQACgkQpGK1HsL+5c1nrgCgueZ6ZaefutFMGSLVK7SgVSUL PbsAn3xd/D4lDW8KLQQfvbIdd3BWtQlT =+D0G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--