From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/61050 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: bkhl@elektrubadur.se (=?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Lindstr=C3=B6m?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: What's wrong with my spam.el settings now? Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:09:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87ek7650ks.fsf@lucien.dreaming> References: <87mznufe09.fsf@lucien.dreaming> <4nmzm7k9jb.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d5n3y89s.fsf@lucien.dreaming> <4nek7iiiho.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ek7iwjqe.fsf@lucien.dreaming> <4noe6mgu71.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4n64smz4gg.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87slvn4sl4.fsf@lucien.dreaming> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1128075541 28423 80.91.229.2 (30 Sep 2005 10:19:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 10:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+m9582@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Sep 30 12:19:00 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELHwu-0005u7-7q for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:17:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1ELHwp-0000yW-00; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 05:16:59 -0500 Original-Received: from nas01.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.39]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1ELHsF-0000yR-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 05:12:15 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas01.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1ELHsE-00009X-66 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 05:12:15 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ELHsC-0006bd-00 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:12:12 +0200 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1ELHqp-0004MG-6V for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:10:47 +0200 Original-Received: from h17n11c1o1124.bredband.skanova.com ([81.230.34.17]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:10:47 +0200 Original-Received: from bkhl by h17n11c1o1124.bredband.skanova.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:10:47 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: h17n11c1o1124.bredband.skanova.com Mail-Copies-To: never X-Home-Page: http://bkhl.elektrubadur.se/ User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lCA0MZzYBeT7SLg3MxO+b4rmMko= X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:61050 Archived-At: Simon Josefsson writes: > This information and the information earlier in the thread doesn't add > up for me. Earlier I interpreted the problem that seen marks were > visible on articles the second time you entered a group with that > article. Did I misunderstand that? Is that still the problem? If > the seen list is updated as above, then the summary buffer shouldn't > have a "unseen" mark on the 11844 article upon entering the group the > second time. Did it? It keeps the unseen dot, even if I repeatedly enter and exit the group.