From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/57270 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: imap spam reporting Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 21:12:58 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <87ekppo3wl.fsf@dod.no> References: <87pt9tx3wn.fsf@dod.no> <87d65rl0zl.fsf@dod.no> <87pt9rhy2s.fsf@dod.no> <87brlbhv0u.fsf@dod.no> <87y8of9doe.fsf@dod.no> <873c6lsx69.fsf@dod.no> <87n04iacoj.fsf_-_@dod.no> <4nr7tpd296.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1084389226 1758 80.91.224.253 (12 May 2004 19:13:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 19:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M5810@lists.math.uh.edu Wed May 12 21:13:40 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BNzAh-0005Et-00 for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 21:13:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BNzAG-0004tk-00; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:13:12 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BNzA8-0004tc-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:13:04 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BNzA7-0004mu-IQ for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:13:03 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28AC3A0035 for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:13:01 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BNzA4-0000g0-00 for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 21:13:00 +0200 Original-Received: from 2k37dm1.cm.chello.no ([80.111.85.245]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 21:13:00 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by 2k37dm1.cm.chello.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 21:13:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 2k37dm1.cm.chello.no Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:WV37O8YO33DUBrGdUveUYYc4Rt0= Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57270 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57270 >>>>> Ted Zlatanov : > On Sat, 08 May 2004, sb@dod.no wrote: >> Would it be possible to write a spam reporting function using the >> imap library of Gnus, that would move an article to a spam >> reporting group on the server? Ie. without first transferring the >> article to Gnus as is done in move operations today? > Yes, but I think it's a bad idea. Maybe it's better to fix Gnus > than to spend time writing such hacks. I disagree that this is a hack. A command like the one I'm suggesting means that spam can be reported by moving it to a different folder on an IMAP server, without first transferring it to Gnus, and then pushing it back to the IMAP server. Sounds to me like a better approach than if I actually had been able to move the spam articles between nnimap groups. As to fixing Gnus in this respect... I'm not really sure what the proper way to handle unreadable nnimap groups is...