From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/52135 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael =?iso-8859-1?q?Teichgr=E4ber?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Using different backends Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 16:26:08 +0200 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <87el3hxw5b.fsf@wmipf.in-berlin.de> References: <84u1cknes9.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <87fznxzemr.fsf@wmipf.in-berlin.de> <84d6j1bhn3.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051885780 26628 80.91.224.249 (2 May 2003 14:29:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 14:29:40 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M678@lists.math.uh.edu Fri May 02 16:29:39 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19BbXf-0006vL-00 for ; Fri, 02 May 2003 16:29:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19BbYS-000870-00; Fri, 02 May 2003 09:30:28 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19BbYO-00086t-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 02 May 2003 09:30:24 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 33036 invoked by alias); 2 May 2003 14:30:23 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 33031 invoked from network); 2 May 2003 14:30:23 -0000 Original-Received: from mail.s.netic.de (212.9.160.11) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 2 May 2003 14:30:23 -0000 Original-Received: from host-213-178-168-30.dial.netic.de ([213.178.168.30] helo=iridium.renata.de) by mail.s.netic.de with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 19BbYJ-0003FM-00 for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 02 May 2003 16:30:19 +0200 Original-Received: from micha by iridium.renata.de with local (MasqMail 0.1.16) id 19BbUz-2bS-00 for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 02 May 2003 16:26:53 +0200 Mail-Reply-To: Michael =?iso-8859-1?q?Teichgr=E4ber?= Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Wo-Ist-Die-ISS: http://wmipf.in-berlin.de/sat/curpos.html X-Betriebssystem: Debian GNU/Linux X-Request-PGP: http://wmipf.in-berlin.de/mtgpg.asc X-PGP-Key: 5656 F203 8343 0A2E 8259 6102 3F0D B4F4 1182 8000 In-Reply-To: <84d6j1bhn3.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann's?= message of "Fri, 02 May 2003 15:30:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52135 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52135 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Anyone willing to try it out and report findings? The manual needs > to be fixed. (setq gnus-secondary-select-methods=20 '((nnfolder ""=20 (mail-sources '((file :plugged t) ; get mail from system mailbox (directory :path "~/Mail/incoming-nnfolder" :suffix "" :plugged t)))) (nnml ""=20 (mail-sources '((directory :path "~/Mail/incoming-nnml" :suffix "" :plugged t)))))) Indeed, this works from what I can tell after some tests.=20 But, why is it much slower than the approach in my previous mail? That one needs around 1 second, this one now takes around 7 seconds (for 20 nnml and 30 nnfolder groups). Does this different scope of 'mail-sources' perhaps introduce an overhead that slows down processing of a group? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+soAIPw209BGCgAARAgv4AKCV3uxsU4BvVDvYm/shOPIos9eKjACeMqOm 4oq4CEcWh/zRLc1Kio9rHuk= =/5PW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--