From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49982 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: deskpot@myrealbox.com (Vasily Korytov) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Changes committed gnus/lisp (ChangeLog gnus-msg.el gnus-sum.el) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:10:41 +0300 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87el6g1oxa.fsf@unix.home> References: <87d6m2ywwq.fsf@unix.home> <87ptq0bkmm.fsf@unix.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044868072 30641 80.91.224.249 (10 Feb 2003 09:07:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 09:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18i9uo-0007y1-00 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 10:07:50 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18i9w3-0004xe-00; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 03:09:07 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 10 Feb 2003 03:10:05 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id DAA28673 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 03:09:53 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 33994 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2003 09:08:50 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 33989 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2003 09:08:50 -0000 Original-Received: from ns1.telekom.ru (root@194.190.195.83) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 10 Feb 2003 09:08:50 -0000 Original-Received: from unix.home (h96.217.elnet.msk.ru [194.190.217.96]) by ns1.telekom.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6) with SMTP id h1A98oEn014545 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:08:51 +0300 Original-Received: (qmail 1961 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2003 09:11:29 -0000 Original-Received: from localhost (alias@127.0.0.1) by localhost with QMTP; 10 Feb 2003 09:11:29 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 1930 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Feb 2003 09:10:43 -0000 Original-To: Russ Allbery X-Attribution: VK Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: (Russ Allbery's message of "Mon, 10 Feb 2003 00:41:50 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49982 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49982 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> "RA" =3D=3D Russ Allbery writes: RA> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) XEmacs/21.4 "Portable Code" RA> (linux) RA> "Portable Code" is not a product/version pair. Anything that isn't a RA> product/version pair needs to be a comment. RA> The User-Agent header in the mail or news context isn't really RA> standardized as such, but it's essentially an adoption of the User-Age= nt RA> header from HTTP. Ah, that's why I don't know anything about it. =3D)) Anyway, probably, you're right and this patch shouldn't be applied. Thanks for info. =2D-=20 I accept RFC3156 and RFC1991-compatible encrypted mail. PGP key fingerprint: 123A 7CCE 6E26 6233 0D87 E01A A0F8 3524 FCD8 1841 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+R2yToPg1JPzYGEERAj3fAJ4y+MmksSQkCw0sUQYXjB6c2sju2gCgh8cO fQpfNuicd3XFcoSoMdmiYas= =9Ikv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--