From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/39665 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Josh Huber Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: new Mail-Followup-To patch...please take a look... Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 19:53:10 -0400 Organization: Mind your own business, you silly arthur king! Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87elntewwp.fsf@mclinux.com> References: <87wv1m9y6j.fsf@mclinux.com> <87bsiy9txe.fsf@mclinux.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035175340 29184 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:42:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:42:20 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 13653 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2001 23:54:14 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2001 23:54:14 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 15wBLv-00036E-00; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 18:52:59 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 23 Oct 2001 18:52:36 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA09579 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 18:52:23 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 13639 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2001 23:52:37 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 13634 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2001 23:52:36 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (HELO quimby2.netfonds.no) (195.204.10.66) by gnus.org with SMTP; 23 Oct 2001 23:52:36 -0000 Original-Received: from news by quimby2.netfonds.no with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15wBRX-0007vc-00 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 01:58:47 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-Lines: 26 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: h000094c5efff.ne.mediaone.net Original-X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1003881527 30479 65.96.250.128 (23 Oct 2001 23:58:47 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Oct 2001 23:58:47 GMT X-Go-Away: or I shall taunt you a second time! X-PGP-KeyID: 6B21489A X-PGP-CertKey: 61F0 6138 BE7B FEBF A223 E9D1 BFE1 2065 6B21 489A X-Request-PGP: finger:huber@db.debian.org Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39665 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39665 Per Abrahamsen writes: > (defun gnus-find-subscribed-adresses () > [...] > However, most of the speed advantage come from > gnus-group-get-parameter instead of gnus-group-find-parameter, which > mean it won't work with topic parameters. Yes, and it also seems as though it doesn't work with gnus-parameters, so i had to change it to use g-g-find-parameter. I'm pretty sure the speed is the same at this point, but I do like your version better. besides this is a cool way to learn new things like...mapc and mapconcat :) So, would it be better to make one regex or have a list? I wonder what's faster? I suspect the single regex is since the regexp engine has probably been optimized very well. i'll reply further down this thread about the new ideas ;) -- Josh Huber