From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38460 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nuutti Kotivuori Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: '.' at the beginning of summary buffer lines Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:11:52 +0300 Message-ID: <87elps5nfb.fsf@smarttrust.com> References: <871ylyiv43.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <87heuuhcon.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <87bsky95kx.fsf@smarttrust.com> <87y9o16al5.fsf@smarttrust.com> <87sne97iuh.fsf@mclinux.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174319 22552 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:25:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:25:19 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 21100 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2001 14:12:15 -0000 Original-Received: from smtp.dave.sonera.fi (131.177.130.21) by gnus.org with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001 14:12:15 -0000 Original-Received: from kotivnu1-nb.etela.sonera.fi ([131.177.205.219]:32881 "EHLO oro") by inside.dave.sonera.fi with ESMTP id ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:11:53 +0300 Original-Received: from naked by oro with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15cp1U-0002mT-00 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:11:52 +0300 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <87sne97iuh.fsf@mclinux.com> (Josh Huber's message of "Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:55:34 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) Original-Lines: 28 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38460 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38460 Josh Huber wrote: >> How did you see the characters I put in the message? (after >> Character set, up there). I put them in the buffer with >> insert-ucs-character. If I am not entirely wrong, something bugs if >> you don't see them as quotation marks - or can't insert them as >> such. The sending charset for the message appears to be ISO-8859-7. > > They looked fine to me... I'll try some ascii art :) This is how they looked in my font: ## ## ## ## # # # # And this is how they should be: # ## # ## ## # ## # So my font is a bit in error but the character codes are right. -- Naked