From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35722 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Josh Huber Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Crypto-MIME in GNUS Date: 10 Apr 2001 10:19:48 -0400 Organization: Gnus Information Center Message-ID: <87elv0kfaz.fsf@mclinux.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171418 4590 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:36:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:36:58 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 26005 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2001 14:19:40 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 26000 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2001 14:19:40 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (195.204.10.139) by gnus.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2001 14:19:40 -0000 Original-Received: (from news@localhost) by quimby.gnus.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA10768 for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:19:38 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: lowell.missioncriticallinux.com Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 986912377 16817 208.51.139.16 (10 Apr 2001 14:19:37 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Apr 2001 14:19:37 GMT X-Go-Away: or I shall taunt you a second time! X-PGP-KeyID: 6B21489A X-PGP-CertKey: 61F0 6138 BE7B FEBF A223 E9D1 BFE1 2065 6B21 489A X-Request-PGP: finger:huber@db.debian.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) Original-Lines: 31 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35722 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35722 "Georg C. F. Greve" writes: > sj> Right, `message-options-set-recipient' only look at the To: > sj> header. > > Exactly. Which is stupid. Unless the others are also you (which is not > the standard case, imho), they won't be able to read the mail then. So > why bother sending it to them at all? I consider this a bug... > ...does pretty much the same. But only almost. It only encrypts the > following part, not the whole message. When I encrypt I normally want > the whole thing encrypted... otherwise you run a high chance to > insert another part and accidentally lose encryption that way. I think this is a bug as well? If I select that I want the message signed or encrypted, it should wrap the entire message (with mime parts included) as an encrypted or signed part. does your code do this properly, or is this just a bug in mml2015? > ...which requires much more action on the receiving part to import the > key. With a proper MIME part, a good mailreader can import that key > with a single keystroke. This is a nice thing that should be included in Gnus IMHO. both the sending of keys and importing. -- Josh Huber