From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 10092 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2021 19:28:11 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 11 Dec 2021 19:28:11 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mw82T-004CH1-89 for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 13:28:09 -0600 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mw82S-001i1G-GD for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 13:28:08 -0600 Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mw82R-001i19-Cg for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 13:28:07 -0600 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mw82O-00D3ck-Qh for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 13:28:07 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References :Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=oedcXdCiRB/dMCyC0eCmhasBlbxDv6JlpE79++07hF0=; b=asq4SWixvc+mn4TBufpco5lOfn TNulykm6XwLloVbgjtfzym7nGfpP6PJY2J7XNd7ewV7poCKIJFbA4ma/vqNVH/se3wj9W+fA69us0 Klno9yk65J+Fv/+xhau/Y51e5a3wWSotsz53BQp/YuDAn8e+7bq37rSD6OachkkKr7hw=; Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mw82F-0006Vw-CY for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 20:27:59 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mw82B-0006QH-8U for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 20:27:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org To: ding@gnus.org From: Emanuel Berg Subject: Re: Recent change on Emacs master: aggressive word-wrap of header lines in article display Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 20:27:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87fsqzt00h.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <87sfuzyudn.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <878rwrhyef.fsf@hope.eyrie.org> <87mtl7f398.fsf@igel.home> <87k0gbyqfw.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4TvlWTAtFp8O3kSWrcUOgsSanqI= Mail-Copies-To: never List-ID: Precedence: bulk Adam Sjøgren wrote: >>> If so, that does seem like a bug, and like it would be >>> better to decode the header first and then wrap it. >> >> I don't think Gnus does any wrapping on its own, it just >> keeps the line breaks of the original header. > > Wrong. For the subject that was in the message I know reply to, in `gnus-article-mode' that is displayed as Subject: Re: Recent change on Emacs master: aggressive word-wrap of header line s in article display with a backslash where the line break happens. In `message-mode', where I'm now, the line isn't broken Subject: Re: Recent change on Emacs master: aggressive word-wrap of header lines in article display I must admit I never gave any case any thought until reading this thread, but FWIW I would think it optimal to have it displayed broken in both cases, only make the break happen at a natural place, e.g. a whitespace. -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal