Re: How to wide-reply (email) to multiple people?

[Alexandre Garreau <galex-713@galex-713.eu>]

This is a feature I’ve been using quite much, and I’d like its behavior
to be more logical toward redundancy of subjects too.

Btw, thanks for S V (didn’t know about it, I thought it would be the
default)!

Some (non-standard, I guess) feature I always wanted is true multiple
reply for emails: like, multiple message-ids in the in-reply-to, and
merging the references of all messages you reply too.  That way
threading becomes a true graph…

I did that some times, rarely.  The worse that happenned until now is
people interpreting it as thread stealing (though I changed the subject,
used Was:, and both subjects and messages were mine).  Would that break
a lot of clients?  How far would that go away from current standards (do
you believe a such thing could become standard one day?)?

I’d love to begin doing that and then making up some interface within
Summary that would display it graph-like like in git :D