Re: New DNS tld “might be bogus”.

[Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>]

"Garreau, Alexandre" <galex-713@galex-713.eu> writes:
>> "Garreau, Alexandre" <galex-713@galex-713.eu> writes:
>>> Le 08/10/2018 à 10h12, Eric Abrahamsen a écrit :
>>>> What's your value of `message-bogus-addresses'? My setup doesn't
>>>> complain
>>> (message-bogus-recipient-p "van@scratch.space") => ("van@scratch.space")
>>
>> I don't know why it would flag that message when it doesn't match
>> `message-bogus-addresses'.
>
>> I don't know what `message-bogus-recipient-p' looks like in your
>> version, or why it's matching that address.
>
> No need to go until source or even debugging, my documentation’s last
> paragraph says “An address might be bogus if the domain part is not
> fully qualified, see ‘message-valid-fqdn-regexp’, or if there’s a
> matching entry in ‘message-bogus-addresses’”, and in fact
> `message-valid-fqdn-regexp' (content afterwards [0]) doesn’t contain
> “space” as a TLD in my version.
>
> So maybe the object of this discussion

I can short-circuit this and tell you that, in the interim, someone's
already had the discussion, and `message-valid-fqdn-regexp' doesn't even
exist anymore in Emacs 27. I think the conclusion was that times have
changed and it's harder to predict what the internet will do, and we
shouldn't be pedantically restrictive when it's not even clear what's
"right" anymore. So there's that!

Emacs 27 isn't released yet, but I'd recommend switching to 26 if
possible. It looks like this option was removed in Feb 2016, so Emacs 26
probably has that change.

Eric