From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/86859 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: duplicates with offlineimap+dovecot Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 15:36:16 +1100 Message-ID: <87fuwv3o3j.fsf@gnus.org> References: <878u34uyk4.fsf@free.fr> <84bn7q9m9i.fsf@cri.ensmp.fr> <87wpqd5u46.fsf@gnus.org> <87si11nz3m.fsf@cri.ensmp.fr> <87r3glp923.fsf@gnus.org> <87io1wfbvp.fsf@cri.ensmp.fr> <87twlcvh9v.fsf@cri.ensmp.fr> <87io1sdnpt.fsf@gnus.org> <87k2m8ndgt.fsf@cri.ensmp.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455424649 27255 80.91.229.3 (14 Feb 2016 04:37:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 04:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: gallego@cri.ensmp.fr (Emilio =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs?= Gallego Arias) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M35081@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Feb 14 05:37:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aUoQu-0007kk-Ox for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 05:37:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aUoQY-0007Yf-0D; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 22:36:54 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aUoQV-0007Y5-JQ for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 22:36:51 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aUoQS-0004Lg-7C for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 22:36:51 -0600 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aUoQQ-00015s-Rc for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 05:36:46 +0100 Original-Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aUoQ4-0005QM-3e; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 05:36:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87k2m8ndgt.fsf@cri.ensmp.fr> ("Emilio =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs?= Gallego Arias"'s message of "Sun, 14 Feb 2016 05:05:38 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aUoQ4-0005QM-3e MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1456029384.96678@xP5rruURWpK4tFbMO8LO5w X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:86859 Archived-At: gallego@cri.ensmp.fr (Emilio Jes=3FFFFAs Gallego Arias) writes: >> The server may send EXPUNGE (or VANISHED) responses before the tagged >> response, so the client cannot safely send more commands with message >> sequence number arguments while the server is processing MOVE or UID >> MOVE. > > Doesn't that mean that gnus should not stream the two MOVES? I interpret that to mean that the client shouldn't send other non-MOVE commands that depend on those MOVEs having been done (when streaming). --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no