From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/86609 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: hard rescan broken? Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:20:38 +0800 Message-ID: <87fuxzr63d.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87si20lr8z.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <16593.1452793198@allegro.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452820891 1750 80.91.229.3 (15 Jan 2016 01:21:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 01:21:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Mike Kupfer Original-X-From: ding-owner+M34836@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Jan 15 02:21:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aJt4n-0007pY-TL for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 02:21:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aJt4V-0002aE-7y; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:20:59 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aJt4T-0002Zu-CD for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:20:57 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aJt4R-0005Gv-Q7 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:20:57 -0600 Original-Received: from mail.ericabrahamsen.net ([50.56.99.223]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aJt4P-0003E3-UB for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 02:20:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [123.123.19.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B0041F40B6; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 01:21:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1452820880; bh=/dTrLyXhNvahD7PulTTPs81R/cgyW4t+LAzd9t6HXVE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=szRdh+9CgeUC/d4xwmthNe2iiCQ5cIKLgrAn9fjKjjyoLjtwCQurqsemtrAX2YMDv Ia07Cs0Tv3Yr8V2x4uwNqBvSFw3JUDNGKW7+qUeI83A75yFSMpnyI+71E9CALyBP33 eLb2oktKqNwiO0IM5ehCZAHt9qK3sFjDae+zq7Hk= In-Reply-To: <16593.1452793198@allegro.localdomain> (Mike Kupfer's message of "Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:39:58 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:86609 Archived-At: Mike Kupfer writes: > Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > >> Would you try out the attached patch? It will >> avoid the error -- I also hope it will produce the correct behavior. > > Yes--the error is gone, and I see Gnus going through a complete rescan. > (Or at least I assume it's a complete rescan; it's a lot slower than a > normal rescan, but in the end everything looks good.) > > Thanks! Okay, cool -- I'll push the patch a little later today. E