From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/79996 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general,gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta Subject: Re: [Bug: 21.5-b29] gnus can't send in 21.5.29 but in 21.4.22 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:50:22 +0200 Message-ID: <87fwjpoytt.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> References: <877h53i7um.fsf@gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es> <87ty86bqwj.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87y5xiqs2u.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316674299 1873 80.91.229.12 (22 Sep 2011 06:51:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 06:51:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org To: Katsumi Yamaoka Original-X-From: ding-owner+M28290@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Sep 22 08:51:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6d8A-0000Bp-UU for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:51:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R6d7F-0004nz-CH; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 01:50:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R6d7B-0004nm-PP for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 01:50:33 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R6d78-00087a-KD for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 01:50:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.uni-ulm.de ([134.60.1.11]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R6d76-0005TO-Od for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:50:29 +0200 Original-Received: from bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.10.175]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p8M6oPbL011720; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:50:26 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF8110C73; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:50:25 +0200 (CEST) X-Face: .*T0'iU(sujq_j9\J>-d4fg;N/1++U#U$_5ii6k.=|"-n'?5O:Hyz&wi'-!I~,}7~GgT=0S /&-R5sbkNy5+Xo1y{Tw2KKxi@Xh"g@]Qc|.U<*]WDd)qvGowFDvfU1F]{EDho:7P0@|oOD=Bc{K4?> WP68K[Mx:}=`ZT'6g4'f+g?;`vri2!)xGy}3:=l'(/Cea0l4lo^H5#@/Z3ev Mail-Followup-To: Katsumi Yamaoka , ding@gnus.org, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org In-Reply-To: (Katsumi Yamaoka's message of "Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:44:21 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-dcc1.aftenposten.no-Metrics: poseidon 1215; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:79996 gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta:35578 Archived-At: On Thu, Sep 22 2011, Katsumi Yamaoka wrote: > Katsumi Yamaoka wrote: >> I realized what we have to fix is `mml-compute-boundary-1'. [...] >> The function looks for ones that are the same as a MIME boundary >> (e.g., =-=-=) in contents of MIME parts, and updates the boundary >> pattern so as to be unique, if any. Contents to be checked should >> be encoded ones, however it doesn't so. As for a file to attach, >> it reads the file without binding `coding-system-for-read', doesn't >> encode it, and looks for things like the boundary in it. That is >> the root cause of an XEmacs 21.5 error. > > Done. Not yet tested with XEmacs 21.5 though. > The new function definition encodes every part in the same way > practicing when actually sending them in advance and then looks > for things like a MIME boundary. So it may slow message sending. > In addition, it assumes that signing and encrypting will never > generate a boundary pattern in data. Note that Aidan Kehoe added ".pdf" to `binary-file-regexps' in XEmacs 21.5 now[1]. If the slowdown is notable and the change is only because of the reported XEmacs problem, it is not necessary, I think. Or does your commit fix a more general problem? [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta/35574 Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/