From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/77212 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: make-progress-reporter suggestions: 'modeline and customizable progress-reporter--pulse-characters Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:08:29 -0600 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87fwreokk2.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87ei76yi1x.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lj1ergg5.fsf@gmx.de> <87ipwi3hjm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwrmr6gf.fsf@gmx.de> <8739nm1u6n.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <878vxdxfzw.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwrj6j18.fsf@gmx.de> <87zkpp43s2.fsf@gmx.de> <87aaho0yi1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ipwb5fcc.fsf@gnus.org> <87fwrf87f3.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298473826 9651 80.91.229.12 (23 Feb 2011 15:10:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 23 16:10:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PsGM8-0000pr-Um for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:10:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49652 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsGM8-0003IY-8C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:10:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50664 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsGLy-0003I4-MX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:10:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PsGLu-0004tt-Qo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:10:10 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:33569) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PsGLu-0004sy-L6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:10:06 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PsGLs-0000eQ-7P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:10:04 +0100 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:10:04 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:10:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110014 (No Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+MYDJRYbeAYYmXObStaTjq+0PxI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136393 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:77212 Archived-At: On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:46:40 +0100 Michael Albinus wrote: MA> Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> >>> Can you try Michael's patch and example I cited and see if it works for >>> you? I think it's OK and if you are happy with it, should go into >>> Emacs. >> >> I haven't tried the patch, but perhaps it could go in and then I could >> try it? :-) MA> I'm waiting, whether there is resistance to that change (Stefan? MA> Chong?). If there is no opposition, I'll install the patch next weekend MA> in the trunk. Please do it sooner. We can revert it, right? And it doesn't break anything AFAIK. Maybe there could be a way, though, of testing for the feature. (featurep progress-reportert-modeline)? Ted