From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/73854 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leonidas Tsampros Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Moving emails around groups woes/problems Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 11:36:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87fwvgqfh6.fsf@bifteki.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288949856 8370 80.91.229.12 (5 Nov 2010 09:37:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:37:36 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M22223@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Nov 05 10:37:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PEIjk-0006vX-0l for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:37:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PEIja-00072V-IC; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 04:37:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PEIjY-00072E-JC for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 04:37:20 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PEIjW-0000Gc-VB for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 04:37:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ww0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PEIjV-0007fJ-00 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:37:17 +0100 Original-Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so1078098wwb.5 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 02:36:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:from:to :subject:user-agent:mail-followup-to:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=+Va3rYLAYycT2Tae14HFNISdLfeNTENcLdfm7PWrSw0=; b=l08kat5agv71EmVDttMNtuCHDKgk0SvyeokOqe1itYc6P3EitNTdoYKcoMnRLjMa5U R7fF38iyIoq6QKGyPZU4JPQpVLUPJ12S5fDoth3bjYJfhm2SYK5zHfgvCzqSb/J46pFv DeOM/6N/qgFUD10Onf2Xwa5mBjVaMb1fvHyG8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:subject:user-agent:mail-followup-to:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; b=ECli+oPdyiDPPpvd6t0mFMQhpUH2/uCwMvpO8KeFqpiLO1+c1jNw9cZXkFaYDEBkc6 88FQreLzOmzVgUitD5djeR5lNCI8qBfFGW4ecMs2GVs3LCS+1ornKP/b48YZK5cbG+Zp Tb4kqP2mc/Al8APsnxL/TI7NTWeuEj+3HnLBA= Original-Received: by 10.227.156.21 with SMTP id u21mr1805594wbw.9.1288949806825; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 02:36:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ltsampros-laptop (darth.bytemobile-rio.ondsl.gr [83.235.57.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w29sm653567weq.43.2010.11.05.02.36.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 05 Nov 2010 02:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ltsampros-laptop (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ltsampros-laptop (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C3040245 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:36:43 +0200 (EET) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:73854 Archived-At: Hello, on my production machine running Gnus v5.13, I face the following situation which might be familiar to some of you or even fixed in No Gnus: nnml:INBOX, 801 emails after compacting. All read some answered, some forwarded. Group has been compacted. Pressing RET on the group does prompt for N number of articles and displayes the correct number of articles. G E information follows: ("nnml:mail.INBOX" 3 ((1 . 809)) ((seen (790 . 809)) (forward 530 549 618) (reply 425 (496 . 497) 511 519 (531 . 532) (534 . 535) (540 . 541) 547 552 629 686 690 751 (768 . 769))) "nnml:") I move 1 read email (id 805) with B m to another group. Let's get at G E output: ("nnml:mail.INBOX" 3 ((1 . 809)) ((seen (790 . 809)) (forward 530 549 618) (reply 425 (496 . 497) 511 519 (531 . 532) (534 . 535) (540 . 541) 547 552 629 686 690 751 (768 . 769))) "nnml:") Voila. Nothing changed. I think this behaviour of B m is fairly wrong since moving a message should have updated this information. The total message count HAS changed. The same happens with the old nnimap. I got frustated because all of a suddenly message counts were wrong, and when prompted with how many messages I wanted to be fetched (e.g. 20) that didn't work. For example: nnimap:exchange-server:INBOX. All mail read. Pressing RET on the group actually prompts me how many messages to fetch from the group (displaying a wrong total of 592 while actually having around 440): I type 20, press RET, and only 6 messages are displayed in my summary buffer, cause well the other 14 do not exist any more in this group. Anyway, do you consider this behaviour as erroneous or not? Thanks, Leonidas