From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70971 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sebastian Krause Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [gnus git] Add ~/.authinfo to the default, since that's probably most useful for users. Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 14:50:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87fwx7nrkx.fsf@news.realpath.org> References: <87iq238tgr.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284814269 16661 80.91.229.12 (18 Sep 2010 12:51:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:51:09 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M19344@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Sep 18 14:51:08 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Owwsl-00023y-TZ for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 14:51:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Owwsd-00082N-3h; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:50:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Owwsb-00082A-TD for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:50:57 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OwwsR-0002K5-Pr for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:50:57 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OwwsR-0000zR-00 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 14:50:47 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwwsP-0001sd-Hq for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 14:50:45 +0200 Original-Received: from e181160247.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.181.160.247]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 14:50:45 +0200 Original-Received: from sebastian by e181160247.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 14:50:45 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e181160247.adsl.alicedsl.de Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAACRQTFRF Gi45UTMqakk/O11tfFxSkHRrXoCRfJSipouFvqei0L230NDMOeopMwAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMB AJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9kBCA0KE3e43B8AAAIzSURBVDjLZZS/itwwEMYHDlLHJoG0FjpIeeDcXpHO kSFtggQqA4G7lAdXHEkdgZwHSDR+gkjbpLZfLjOSsvZevmbZ+c03oz8jwzyvT5VYEI/5z7Is67FE FwpHhFSTYprTSRERcnpC1oQ7ZZDQo7fOs6ZpAwv6YLS1ftMUCCwxeK2M8WfKwOtBKfsULCl8F0KN FfCPyyCh+9AKZSowJEcY1uh010oyOGs2eVh+m66hSjWgx38ghoEBrUqrKmJUCs3QUQuWKFKcZcFr 0bRSqUGIpkiwx4LjSoKyu6a5tN7orpE7IDhf6ne91rxGLqUH0Zb4iwFIb6iFHGlVBFhUSDYMoFVK ZyBqoVY8h5t7gIHyHYGPgyyGtrl4dvcH4Hosh6iEzIZGNJ96gIurazvRvc2g5FBA9/KeQf8leLrE GbSqoHn1kMHX4BFpfFTddNu9fuivLvobuk+c05EcKjdvu/c/+8Nt/zY6T/EVTHYwsL8+Hw79NzIk Bk6fAD72/R36iePkMCqfoBAW8fEWw0QdaKbAFUDnResPP8jAHQjQ7XMtAuNEQ0p7SHmcIXiTL092 lzYEz0stANlCHimMxcCdcyUCZKG9SDXQwPIWimGFmC1ajcoj1z+Wh7RCisHRHI007AFP+QT4cdAM 0oBOiLV+BTFfDD8WMiwb4OcxhfyKtvwCkNMT4ql+AfkFUpm471BBDZ9ZcimuUnQ8B+Xp52/FbrlL wi057R0pzmdtN7A7iD1IGfzn+AsV+h7ay6PlegAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8FGBbqMRWkrDMJToxxdGV85+Ovk= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70971 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov wrote: > I was trying to discourage people from putting their password in > an unencrypted file. So I'm sort of OK with making the > unencrypted file the second choice, but I'd like to at least warn > the user. WDYT? Personally, I don't like to enter my long GnuPG password every time I start up Gnus. It's safe enough anyway because I use full disk encryption with LUKS. Or maybe those passwords are not too important because they're only for a simple Usenet server. So, warning users shouldn't be too noisy because there might be good reasons of using the unencrypted file.