From: Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc>
To: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Cc: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: message-mode is now default?
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:42:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fxcrw0gp.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87eisb715o.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:46:27 -0400")
On Mon, Jul 20 2009, Chong Yidong wrote:
> Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> In the most important senses -- the general UI and method of operation
>> -- message-mode is very much compatible... There are clearly things
>> that need to be ironed out, so we should iron them out.
>>
>> The hook situation seems one of the more important issues; is anybody
>> going to comment on my suggestion for merging the hooks?
>
> How troublesome would it be to make message-mode derived from mail-mode?
> This would solve the hooks problem in a clean way.
Wouldn't this imply that message-mode depends on mail-mode so we would
keep the (partial) code duplication?
> It might also bring other minor conveniences, such as letting us
> merge their syntax tables and/or font-lock keywords.
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-20 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1MRmmG-0006yL-WB@fencepost.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <E1MRn3w-0003wj-QT@fencepost.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <E1MRxo5-00037n-1N@fencepost.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <878wimdbzp.fsf@catnip.gol.com>
[not found] ` <87tz1av8ik.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
[not found] ` <83vdlqp0rt.fsf@gnu.org>
2009-07-19 11:41 ` Differences between mail-mode and message-mode (was: message-mode is now default?) Reiner Steib
2009-07-19 12:32 ` Differences between mail-mode and message-mode Sven Joachim
2009-07-19 17:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-07-19 18:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-07-22 7:35 ` Differences between mail-mode and message-mode (was: message-mode is now default?) Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-07-22 18:46 ` Differences between mail-mode and message-mode Reiner Steib
2009-07-23 3:05 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-07-23 5:03 ` Miles Bader
[not found] ` <jwviqhq14u9.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
[not found] ` <E1MSRQV-0006zG-40@fencepost.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <873a8tc92j.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
[not found] ` <E1MSU0K-0005kX-PZ@fencepost.gnu.org>
2009-07-19 11:56 ` Differences between mail-mode and message-mode - sending mail (was: message-mode is now default?) Reiner Steib
[not found] ` <E1MSO9K-00030v-Go@fencepost.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <87k525mfo7.fsf@catnip.gol.com>
[not found] ` <87eisb715o.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
2009-07-20 20:42 ` Reiner Steib [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fxcrw0gp.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de \
--to=reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc \
--cc=Reiner.Steib@gmx.de \
--cc=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).