From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/63090 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Elias Oltmanns Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: slow PGP in No Gnus v0.4 Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:22:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87fyjvckwx.fsf@denkblock.local> References: <871wvtbzwn.fsf@lapin-bleu.net> <87wtdft96c.fsf@lapin-bleu.net> <87d5f6kjcc.fsf@w3.org> <9eslo2alzk.fsf@gowron.rz-berlin.mpg.de> <871wvl95b6.fsf@lapin-bleu.net> <9emze9trg9.fsf@doze.jochen-kuepper.de> <87odyobp8d.fsf@lapin-bleu.net> <9efyjvgvs7.fsf@doze.jochen-kuepper.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146399818 16392 80.91.229.2 (30 Apr 2006 12:23:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+m11617@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Apr 30 14:23:36 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FaAxY-0002kA-6z for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:23:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FaAxU-0007lb-00; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 07:23:28 -0500 Original-Received: from nas02.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.40]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FaAxH-0007lV-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 07:23:15 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas02.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FaAxD-0004FY-1b for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 07:23:15 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1FaAxC-0007fp-00 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:23:10 +0200 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FaAx2-0002gM-6u for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:23:00 +0200 Original-Received: from b-180-32-19.k.dial.de.ignite.net ([62.180.32.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:23:00 +0200 Original-Received: from oltmanns by b-180-32-19.k.dial.de.ignite.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:23:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: b-180-32-19.k.dial.de.ignite.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Cancel-Lock: sha1:3j65yFF3YL1suVPmFs1NtcQwRzw= X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:63090 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Jochen Küpper > writes: [...] >> The background color of the whole modeline could change accordingly, >> but that might be to colorful;) > > It's a possibility. Kinda analogous to what Firefox does with https. > > But I think it might be overkill. If the signature verifies, then > that's all good, but I don't really see the need for any big splashy > way of saying so. It's what's supposed to happen, and the user > doesn't need to know about it. I disagree on that one, I'm afraid. There are three states of a message which the user should be able to tell apart easily: 1. Message has been signed and verification failed (obvious); 2. message has been signed and verification succeeded (as opposed to) 3. message hasn't been signed in the first place. Regards, Elias