From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/57130 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: deskpot@despammed.com (Vasily Korytov) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spamc invocation: move from procmail to Gnus Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 15:15:35 +0400 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <87fzardm7c.fsf@unix.home.local> References: <873c6tdvbs.fsf@unix.home.local> <87ekqb7sqy.fsf@unix.home.local> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1082978257 8021 80.91.224.253 (26 Apr 2004 11:17:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M5670@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Apr 26 13:17:29 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BI477-0002CB-00 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:17:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BI46c-000331-00; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 06:16:58 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BI46T-00032t-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 06:16:49 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BI46S-0007uA-J3 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 06:16:48 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16573A0226 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 06:16:46 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BI46P-0005iV-00 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:16:45 +0200 Original-Received: from d172-70.dialup.relline.ru ([195.146.70.172]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:16:45 +0200 Original-Received: from deskpot by d172-70.dialup.relline.ru with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:16:45 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 31 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: d172-70.dialup.relline.ru Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:WOsxD1nNRwwYgVY1GrTyDQAl4LQ= Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57130 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57130 On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 09:24:30 +0200, Jonas Steverud wrote: > I'm sorry, but I don't think I can help with this setup. I found > during my investigations that is was nontrivial - even very hard IMHO > - to get Gnus to call Spamassassin and gave up. If you can consider > switching to bogofilter it becomes trivial to use. The downside is > that you won't know what triggered the spam level (although I think > that bogofilter could tell you that if you feed it a false positive > manually, but I haven't checked the docs). Using spamassassin from spam.el gives this results too. I consider this nothing but awkward. =(( Maybe, it's really not from the Gnus angle (not procmail and SA's), but I don't understand that yet. Another solution is to write `spamc -c` output to some other file, and retrieve it as needed. But also a hack to SA is needed: current output it too trimmed down. I'll think of it. > One solution that you probably already have thought of is to have > spamd run on a more resourceful server and have the mail server run > spamc, if spamc can work across a network and the mail server is not > that limited, which I guess it is. I've already thought of it. Unfortunately, there're no other full-time on machines in this subnet. =(( Thanks. -- I accept RFC3156 and RFC2440-compatible encrypted mail. PGP key fingerprint: 3273 7F6F 7B87 5DD5 9848 05FB E442 86BC 2E6B 6831