From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/30213 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chris Shenton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: 5.8.3 External body parts failing? Date: 22 Apr 2000 15:12:36 -0400 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87g0sear17.fsf@thanatos.shenton.org> References: <87k8iop0zl.fsf@thanatos.shenton.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035166778 7290 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:19:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D30D051E for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 15:09:10 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAB04123; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 14:09:09 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 22 Apr 2000 14:08:39 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA22787 for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 14:08:29 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from thanatos.shenton.org (cshenton.customer.execdsl.net [206.64.112.238]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B56AD051E for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 15:08:47 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (qmail 50558 invoked by uid 1000); 22 Apr 2000 19:12:36 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "20 Apr 2000 03:06:08 +0200" Original-Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.5 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:30213 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:30213 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Hm, yes. I don't think Gnus does external-body at all, really... It > should, though. Is it used much? Perhaps not, as this was the first time I've tried to use it. It could be very helpful though for referencing docs that "permanently" reside somewhere else, like various RFC repositories.