From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24514 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: minor nit with pgnus mail-fetching Date: 27 Jul 1999 10:21:04 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87g12atsen.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035162068 9156 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:01:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA24542 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 04:26:16 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAB25290; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 03:22:24 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 27 Jul 1999 03:22:55 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA18591 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 03:22:45 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from pc-hrvoje.srce.hr (mail@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr [161.53.2.132]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA24490 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 04:21:37 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from hniksic by pc-hrvoje.srce.hr with local (Exim 3.02 #1 (Debian)) id 1192U0-0001q0-00 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 10:21:08 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > nnml: Reading incoming mail from directory... > > and never says "done" or "no news" or even erases the message. Thus, > one does not immediately know if it is taking Gnus a long time to > access the file or if there is in fact no mail there. > > This is suboptimal behavior. How about this quickie patch: --- nnmail.el.orig Tue Jul 27 10:15:06 1999 +++ nnmail.el Tue Jul 27 10:19:16 1999 @@ -1447,7 +1447,9 @@ (incf total new) (incf i)))) ;; If we did indeed read any incoming spools, we save all info. - (unless (zerop total) + (if (zerop total) + (nnheader-message 4 "%s: Reading incoming mail (no new mail)...done" + method (car source)) (nnmail-save-active (nnmail-get-value "%s-group-alist" method) (nnmail-get-value "%s-active-file" method)) You can also try replacing the nnheader-message thing with something that just clears the echo area instead of cluttering it and see if that which one works out better.