From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 16823 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2021 07:35:52 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 25 Oct 2021 07:35:52 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1meuWN-00BhLI-BB for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 02:35:51 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1meuWM-00CGVP-Ol for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 02:35:50 -0500 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1meuWM-00CGVK-1Y for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 02:35:50 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1meuWJ-00BhL1-D8 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 02:35:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject: From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=8V3CrnXLvNpsW1oirMG4HpWEEC5dRUzMt+4czbEmXbg=; b=L7nZ2PYJr/NcHjQH/DhinE28AQ 0R1jwPb1Kh6DHyzncz2rirCfg41Qro2bMp47s6aumWOAA6nfPt7ktKiDxypQo8XZgzWoF1eln/IaA p0pJrc1WzNWBkClYT1l4vEa9sdgVrb2HzqQPqiTGUrIUVnqcnFYtXgAvtGPPQBe877aM=; Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1meuWB-0007Mu-Ji for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:35:42 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1meuWA-0001lX-E4 for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:35:38 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org To: ding@gnus.org From: Emanuel Berg Subject: Re: sorry man off-topic Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:35:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87h7d5wo8w.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <87ee8dl53r.fsf@penguin> <87wnm5nx25.fsf@zoho.eu> <87wnm1muif.fsf@eps142.cdf.udc.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:sUd8OnfMMn9MB6G8RcUZAu7u7ag= Mail-Copies-To: never List-ID: Precedence: bulk Alberto Luaces wrote: > Not a bad book, of course, but it is severely outdated; in > fact the wiki says that the last edition is from 1988, so > maybe the code in the first one doesn't even compile on > modern compilers due to deprecated syntax. > > I have not read "Effective C" by Robert C. Seacord, but it's > up to date with the latest C standards, according to > the description. Aren't C standards mostly concern with backward compatibility anyway? -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal