Uwe Brauer writes: >> and they are not ordered monotonically. So which criterion do you >> actually want to use for sorting. > > Well if the date and time is too messy, I'd say I would like to sort by > number, but I want it montonically indepent whether threading is on or off I think, thus should be (setq gnus-thread-sort-functions '(gnus-thread-sort-by-number) gnus-article-sort-functions '(gnus-article-sort-by-number)) then. > But it should be displayed as > > 57606 [ Uwe Braue] Uwe Brauer [[CV] (was: [Amnu 19]) ] Sun, 28 Apr 2019 11:30:41 +0200 8.8k 6 > 57609 [ +henar de ] Uwe Brauer [ ] Sun, 28 Apr 2019 09:35:45 +0000 10k 13 > 57585 [ tex-d-l-r] tex-d-l@li [tex-d-l Nachrichtenkompil] Sun, 28 Apr 2019 00:00:07 +0200 13k 165 > 57593 [ users ] oub@mat.uc [Subject: Digest of users@] Sun, 28 Apr 2019 08:00:27 +0000 (UTC) 38k 11 > 57621 [ Uwe Braue] Uwe Brauer [[stuff] (was: [CV]) ] Sun, 28 Apr 2019 16:04:34 +0200 9.4k 16 > > That is what Thunderbird does and it looks more natural to me. > Did I explain clear enough what I want? Well, above you've said you want to sort by number and then you present an example which is not sorted by number... I don't know how thunderbird sorts, so I cannot come up with a "just like thunderbird" configuration. >> (setq gnus-thread-sort-functions '(gnus-thread-sort-by-number >> gnus-thread-sort-by-most-recent-date >> gnus-thread-sort-by-total-score) >> gnus-subthread-sort-functions '(gnus-thread-sort-by-number >> gnus-article-sort-by-date)) > > I tried that out did not work. If it gives a different result for you than for me that's really strange given that be both seem to use quite similar Emacs/Gnus versions. Sorry, I don't have any ideas left. BTW, you can also re-sort the summary buffer interactively using the commands bound to the C-c C-s prefix. That's probably quicker to find a sorting version that suits your needs. Bye, Tassilo