From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/88268 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Gijs Hillenius Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Marks added in nnir search buffers don't propagate to the actual groups? Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:35:43 +0100 Organization: Using Emacs' Org Mode Message-ID: <87h8g0ffhc.fsf@hillenius.net> References: <87muptvx9c.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1543480493 23091 195.159.176.226 (29 Nov 2018 08:34:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 08:34:53 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M36478@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Nov 29 09:34:48 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gSHma-0005qE-1a for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:34:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1gSHnw-0004W1-3P; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 02:36:12 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1gSHnj-0004TB-Fz for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 02:35:59 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1gSHng-00047j-OS for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 02:35:59 -0600 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (helo=blaine.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gSHnf-0001NU-FC for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:35:55 +0100 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gSHlT-0004LP-Fu for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:33:39 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux Sid X-Homepage: http://www.hillenius.net/ X-GPG-Fingerprint: 340F F9A4 8F6C 18FD D032 0C33 ABA1 CB30 E997 A3AF Cancel-Lock: sha1:8r0reTGAliz4D+WMuWyABxedVmw= X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.4.2 2018-09-13) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.4098 Ham tokens: 0.000-189--7208h-0s--0d--buffers, 0.000-185--7068h-0s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-36--1356h-0s--0d--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-35--1336h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-28--1063h-0s--0d--H*UA:Gnus Spam tokens: 0.997-34856--662h-28040s--0d--H*r:quimby.gnus.org, 0.995-35867--1073h-29163s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.994-37009--1168h-30139s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-external:quimby.gnus.org, 0.994-37009--1168h-30139s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.994-36958--1358h-30249s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-internal:quimby.gnus.org Autolearn status: no autolearn_force=no 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4098] 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:88268 Archived-At: On 28 November 2018 11:05 Eric Abrahamsen, wrote: > Can anyone confirm that changes to marks made in an nnir search buffer > don't propagate to the real articles? Eg you search for an article, > remove its read mark, and then expect to find it unread in the "real" > underlying group. Or you tick it, or whatever. > > This is something I noticed ages ago, but sort of figured it was a > problem in my config, but now I've looked into it and so far as I can > tell this is just the way it works. This is also how I understand Gnus. I nearly automatically do A W gnus-warp-to-article to set or remove tickmarks