From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/87878 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: is there a hook just for replying messages. Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:02:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87h8qd9r9j.fsf@mat.ucm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1519038164 31586 195.159.176.226 (19 Feb 2018 11:02:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:02:44 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m36092@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Feb 19 12:02:40 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from mxfilter-048034.atla03.us.yomura.com ([107.189.48.34]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1enjCx-0005jb-3r for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:02:07 +0100 X-Yomura-MXScrub: 1.0 Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu (unknown [129.7.128.208]) by mxfilter-048034.atla03.us.yomura.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 90623cd1-1564-11e8-83d2-b499baa2b07a; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1enjDj-0006BL-Gy; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 05:02:55 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1enjDf-0006AZ-47 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 05:02:51 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1enjDd-00084y-1x for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 05:02:50 -0600 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (helo=blaine.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1enjDb-00010W-Ny for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:02:47 +0100 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1enjBN-0008Tm-BQ for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:00:29 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 37 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:Pct3Fcb1s+5dKCGSI5ttjZyue40= X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.4.1 2015-04-28) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.4983 Ham tokens: 0.000-9--335h-0s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-9--330h-0s--0d--H*MI:fsf, 0.000-8--266h-0s--1d--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-8--265h-0s--1d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-6--206h-0s--1d--H*UA:Gnus Spam tokens: 0.997-28929--550h-23811s--0d--H*r:quimby.gnus.org, 0.997-17174--329h-14138s--0d--HX-Envelope-From:sk:junkmas, 0.997-17174--329h-14138s--0d--H*RT:sk:junkmas, 0.997-17174--329h-14138s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-internal:sk:junkmas, 0.994-29898--938h-24907s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org Autolearn status: no autolearn_force=no 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4983] 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:87878 Archived-At: Hi I have started to use the package messages-are-flowing. For that to work, I have to set. (with-eval-after-load "message" (add-hook 'message-mode-hook 'messages-are-flowing-use-and-mark-hard-newlines)) Then via hardlines, my mails look nicer in handheld devices such as the iPhone. However in addition I am using for replying mails, quotes that start like this > As I said No you did not. Then the messages-are-flowing packages makes the messages look much worse on a handheld, but ok on a normal device. I could use > As I said And would avoid the problem. However I am looking for two hooks: One to be used only for «normal/no reply» message the other hook should be called when I reply to a message, this way I could remove the hook when replying messages. Do such hooks exit? Thanks Uwe Brauer