From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/80991 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nntp and authinfo working? Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:20:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87hazh6p04.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87sjjnei6u.fsf@lifelogs.com> <5e1ur71phl.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <87ehv7crqd.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878vlfcrb5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871ur7cpc0.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327684863 12965 80.91.229.12 (27 Jan 2012 17:21:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:21:03 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M29273@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Jan 27 18:20:59 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RqpTv-00058D-3c for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:20:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RqpTq-0004KG-OY; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:20:54 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RqpTp-0004K1-KA for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:20:53 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RqpTo-0006rs-HE for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:20:53 -0600 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqpTn-0003kH-4j for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:20:51 +0100 Original-Received: from 93-41-188-50.ip82.fastwebnet.it ([93.41.188.50] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqpTh-0006kR-FU for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:20:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: <871ur7cpc0.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:47:11 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1RqpTh-0006kR-FU MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1328289645.74472@Xte54hnXFWiWAyEcNBU3Og X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:80991 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > I'm pretty sure this is because nntp.el assumes there is only one server > buffer per machine address. Lars will have to look at it, I don't know > the nnoo stuff well enough. No, there's no limit to the number of nntp server buffers (per machine address). At least there shouldn't be. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome