From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/77240 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: make-progress-reporter suggestions: 'modeline and customizable progress-reporter--pulse-characters Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 23:04:07 +0100 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <87hbbuv25k.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <87ei76yi1x.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lj1ergg5.fsf@gmx.de> <87ipwi3hjm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwrmr6gf.fsf@gmx.de> <8739nm1u6n.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <878vxdxfzw.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwrj6j18.fsf@gmx.de> <87zkpp43s2.fsf@gmx.de> <87aaho0yi1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ipwb5fcc.fsf@gnus.org> <87fwrf87f3.fsf@gmx.de> <87tyfuh3l3.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298504744 31961 80.91.229.12 (23 Feb 2011 23:45:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 23:45:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 24 00:45:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PsOOm-0005qm-Ba for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:45:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38040 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsNGQ-0007fT-Cb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:32:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49788 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsMow-0008Mk-RR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:04:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PsMot-00084p-AM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:04:28 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PsMot-00084a-4y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:04:27 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PsMop-0006YY-2v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 23:04:23 +0100 Original-Received: from p508ed026.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.142.208.38]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 23:04:23 +0100 Original-Received: from dak by p508ed026.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 23:04:23 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p508ed026.dip.t-dialin.net X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:qMFXShvjjewBuIb5/6vq5rpK+cE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136416 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:77240 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: > Michael Albinus writes: > >> I'm waiting, whether there is resistance to that change (Stefan? >> Chong?). If there is no opposition, I'll install the patch next >> weekend in the trunk. > > I'm dubious about the idea. The mode-line is supposed to show > information about one window, while the progress-reporter is a global > indicator, so conceptually it's not a good fit. The "Compiling" indicator is of the same nature, and nobody complained about it yet. -- David Kastrup