From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/74315 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sven Joachim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [BUG] yanking base64 encoded e-mail is a fail Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:38:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87hbf6tq2l.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> References: <8739qrlkjq.fsf@kotik.lan> <87zksy4gbc.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290631148 19300 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2010 20:39:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:39:08 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M22680@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Nov 24 21:39:04 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PLM7L-0007rc-Ms for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:39:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PLM7H-0002VH-Qg; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:38:59 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PLM7G-0002V5-HX for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:38:58 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PLM7F-0001rK-MB for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:38:58 -0600 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23] helo=mail.gmx.net) by quimby.gnus.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PLM7E-0002km-00 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:38:56 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2010 20:38:25 -0000 Original-Received: from p54861F43.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO turtle.gmx.de) [84.134.31.67] by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 24 Nov 2010 21:38:25 +0100 X-Authenticated: #28250155 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18YuOU9VI8YaCchFADqbnvdYy3X8CrPdZ2/FvP5GL 4TjLAriSWNIG7K Original-Received: by turtle.gmx.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 638E63F46A; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:38:26 +0100 (CET) Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <87zksy4gbc.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> (Julien Danjou's message of "Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:28:23 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2.90 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:74315 Archived-At: On 2010-11-24 21:28 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: > <#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign> Hm, this line should not actually have been sent, should it? > On Wed, Nov 24 2010, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > >> I found the problem. It's the <#secure thing which made >> message-goto-body return the wrong thing. >> >> I've now reverted the change. > > I've re-reverted with a fix. Does this seems good to you? Looks like there's still some flaw if mml tags end up in mails. Cheers, Sven