From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70759 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: That newfangled IMAP thing... Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:26:31 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: <87hbhu27qw.fsf@dod.no> References: <87pqwmsusz.fsf@news.realpath.org> <8762yd6j4j.fsf@rimspace.net> <87eid0fsil.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp84y00w.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <874odv4ar3.fsf@rimspace.net> <87lj770y3d.fsf@dod.no> <87bp82529c.fsf@mid.gehheimdienst.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284312449 4596 80.91.229.12 (12 Sep 2010 17:27:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 17:27:29 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M19132@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Sep 12 19:27:28 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuqKs-00030k-FX for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:27:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OuqKL-0007JI-5G; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:26:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OuqKJ-0007J2-O4 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:26:51 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OuqKF-0001jP-FX for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:26:51 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OuqKE-0003Lq-00 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:26:46 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuqK8-0002ho-9y for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:26:40 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no ([84.208.200.46]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:26:40 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:26:40 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:17j+Gtn71jlpkuyA3VHD6kxxGwU= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70759 Archived-At: >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen : > Right... so the mail splitter should probably pull down all the flags > first, and skip anything that's been flagged as read or deleted before > doing anything. Which means that it has to be careful about the EXPUNGE as mentioned in a different posting. I mean: even if you download them in a special place for doing the splitting, you will want to delete all of the ones that have been COPY'd in the server side INBOX. But you don't want to touch the ones that have simply been deleted.